STACK ERP — prototype, four directions
Two formats, two scopes.
A filterable comparator and a written comparison, each run twice: once across every ERP, once inside Oracle JD Edwards. All four read the same research — 56 platforms on 30 criteria for the general field, 24 players on 26 criteria for JDE. Nothing is invented and nothing is rounded up: Aviron leads the general grid at 4.70, and the criteria the publisher fails are printed on its own scorecard.
All ERPs · Direction 1
The filterable comparator
56 platforms that automate finance on top of an existing ERP, scored on 30 criteria. Left-hand filter panel with live counts, a score out of 5, and a full scorecard per vendor. Check what your shop needs and the ranking recalculates on those criteria alone.
Open this direction
All ERPs · Direction 2
The written comparison
The same data as an editorial piece rather than a list: anchored contents, a two-minute verdict box, the comparison table, twelve platforms one by one with strengths and limits, a verdict and an FAQ.
Open this direction
JD Edwards · Direction 1
The JD Edwards comparator
24 players mapped across five groups — native agents, embedded modules, generalist AP tools, integration layers and Oracle itself — on a grid built for JDE: who creates the voucher, who goes through supported paths, who still ships a CSV overnight.
Open this direction
JD Edwards · Direction 2
The JD Edwards written comparison
The JDE field written out: what the community actually recommends, what each vendor claims, where the proof is thin — including where it is thin for the publisher.
Open this direction
STACK ERP is published by Aviron, which builds one of the products compared. Every vendor is scored on the same criteria with the same weights, and the methodology page publishes both the grid and the disclosure.